User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110429 Mandriva Linux/1.9.2.17-0.1mdv2010.0 (2010.0) Firefox/3.6.17
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Firefox 3.6.17Mandriva 2010Gecko 1.9.2desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.6Gecko 1.9.2Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.08201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.209 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Mandriva 1.9desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.6.17closeMandriva 2010.0closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.17closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.071 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.17Gecko 20110429Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.17Gecko 1.9.2Mandriva 2010desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.6.17closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:42 | by ThaDafinser