User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 Opera/9.80 (KDDI-KC4A; BREW; Opera Mobi; U; ja) Presto/2.4.18 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Opera Mobile 10.00Brew Presto KDDIKC4Afeature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00close Opera SoftwareOperamobile-browseryescloseclose0.197 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto Brew KDDIKC4Afeature phoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.0closeBREW closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0.081 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.18 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.453 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.18Brew KyoceraK011mobile:featureyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera KC4Acloseclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 10.00close KDDITS3OFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:42 | by ThaDafinser