User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:20.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/20.0 SeaMonkey/2.17.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/desktop.yml
SeaMonkey 2.17.1Windows 8Gecko desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SeaMonkey 2.17Gecko Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.05201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 20.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.17.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.226 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.17Gecko Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.17.1closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.17.1closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.17.1closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.17.1Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.422 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.17.1Gecko 20.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 20.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 20.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:42 | by ThaDafinser