User agent detail

Midori/0.4 (CentOS 6.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
Midori 0.4 desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.4closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.4WebKit CentOS 6.5desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Midori 0.4closeCentOS closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.4close closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.4 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.4 desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser