User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 7_0_6 like Mac OS X; de-DE) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/3.11558IT Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 3.0iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 3.0WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.025 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 3.11558closeiOS 7.0.6AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.179 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 3.11558WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeiOS 7.0.6closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 3.11558closeiOS 7.0.6AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeiPhone OS 7.0.6closecloseclosecloseclose0.051 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 3.11558WebKit 534.35 iPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.425 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 3Webkit 534.35iOS 7.0.6AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0.3closeiOS 7.0.3AppleiPadTabletyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser