User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; SGH-I717D Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/33.0.1750.136 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I717D Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 33.0Blink Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungSGH-i717Dmobile-browseryescloseclose0.268 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 33.0Blink Android 4.0SamsungSGH-I717Dsmartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 33.0.1750closeAndroid 4.0.4SamsungSGH-I717Dcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 33.0.1750.136WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.412 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 33Blink Android 4.0.4SamsungGalaxy Notemobile:smartyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 33.0.1750.136closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 33closeAndroid 4.0SamsungSGH-i717DSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.06901 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser