User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.0.1; PMT3177_3G Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/40.0.2214.109 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 40.0Android 5.0unknown PrestigioMultiPad PMT3177 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 5.0PrestigioMultiPad PMT3177 3GTabletyesyes0.07401 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 5.0.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.258 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 40.0Blink Android 5.0tabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeAndroid 5.0.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 40.0.2214closeAndroid 5.0.1PMT3177_3Gcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.0.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.125 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 40.0.2214.109WebKit 537.36Android 5.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 40Blink Android 4.4.2PrestigioMultipad Journey 7.0 3Gtabletyescloseclose0.032 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 40.0.2214.109closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 41closeAndroid 5.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser