User agent detail

OneBrowser/4.2.0/Adr(Linux; U; Android 4.0.4; in-id; CROSS AT1 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
EvercossCross AT1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
OneBrowser 4.2WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0closeAndroid 4.0.4CROSS AT1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.273 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
ONE Browser 4.2WebKit Android 4.0yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeChrome OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0.4closeAndroid 4.0.4EvercossCross AT1closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
OneBrowser 4.2.0WebKit 533.1Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.383 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OneBrowser 4.2.0Webkit 533.1Android 4.0.4CrossAT1tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.047 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser