User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Java; U; en-us; lg-gb175) AppleWebKit/530.13 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/8.5.0.185/82/352/UCWEB Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGgb175 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.07901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 530.13closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.204 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.5WebKit LGgb175smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.5.0close LGgb175closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.095 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.5.0.185WebKit 530.13 LGLGgb175closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.502 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.5Gecko LGgb175mobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 4.0Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:40 | by ThaDafinser