User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD; U; Viera; pt-BR) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Viera/1.5.1 Chrome/14.0.835.202 Safari/535.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-096.php
SmartViera 1.5FreeBSD unknownunknown PanasonicViera TVTV Device Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
SmartViera 1.5WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicViera TVTV Device0.07701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeBSD desktop-browsercloseclose0.188 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 14.0WebKit FreeBSD PanasonicSmart TVtv0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 14.0.835closeFreeBSD closeclosecloseclose0.023 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202closeFreeBSD closecloseclosecloseclose0.066 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 14.0.835.202WebKit 535.1FreeBSD closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.519 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Viera Browser 1.5.1Webkit 535.1 PanasonicVieratelevisioncloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 14.0.835.202closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:39 | by ThaDafinser