User agent detail

MQQBrowser/35 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone 3GS; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_1 like Mac OS X; xx) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/8B117 Safari/7534.48.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-ios.yaml
QQ Browser 3.5iOS 4.1Webkit 532.9AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
QQbrowser WebKit iOS AppleiPhoneMobile Phoneyesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7534.48.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
QQbrowser 35closeiOS 4.1SonyEricssonST25imobile-browseryescloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
QQ Browser 35WebKit iOS 4.1AppleiPhone 3GSsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeiOS 4.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
QQ Browser Mobile 35closeiOS 4.1closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 4.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.106 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
QQ Browser 35WebKit 532.9iOS 4.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.401 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
QQ Browser 3.5Webkit 532.9iOS 4.1AppleiPhone 3GSmobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 4.0.5closeiOS 4.0AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:39 | by ThaDafinser