User agent detail

JUC(Linux;U;Android2.2.1;Zh_cn;GT-S5570;240*320;)UCWEB7.8.0.95/140/350
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Android 2.2.1 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android 2.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
JUC closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeAndroid 2.2.1GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.288 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8 Android SamsungGT-S5570smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid 2.2.1SamsungGT-S5570closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95 Android SamsungGalaxy Minicloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8 Android 2.2.1SamsungGalaxy Minimobile:smartyescloseclose0.08801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:39 | by ThaDafinser