User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 3.2.1; en-US; A101 Build/HTK55D) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/10.2.0.535 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
UC Browser 10.2Android 3.2unknown MicromaxA101Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 10.2U3 Android 3.2MicromaxA101Tabletyesyes0.009 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 3.2.1AcerA101mobile-browseryescloseclose0.263 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 10.2WebKit Android 3.2AcerIconia Tab A101tabletyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 10.2.0closeAndroid 3.2.1AcerA101closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 3.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.074 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 10.2.0.535WebKit 534.30Android 3.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 10.2Webkit 534.30Android 3.2.1AcerIconia Tab A101tabletyescloseclose0.009 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 10closeAndroid 3.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:39 | by ThaDafinser