User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.32 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chromium/25.0.1349.2 Chrome/25.0.1349.2 Safari/537.32 Debian/unstable (3.8.2-4) Epiphany/3.8.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-linux.yaml
GNOME Web 3.8.2Debian Webkit 537.32desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chromium 25.0WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Epiphany 3.8WebKit Debian desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Epiphany 3.8.2closeDebian closeclosecloseclose0.018 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Epiphany 3.8.2closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.065 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Epiphany 3.8.2WebKit 537.32Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
GNOME Web 3.8.2Webkit 537.32Debian desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1349.2closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 25.0.1364.99closeMac OS X 10.8.5Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:38 | by ThaDafinser