User agent detail

Opera/9.25 (X11; Linux i686; U; xx)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 9.25Linux desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 9.25Presto 2.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 9.25closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.25closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 9.25Presto GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 9.25closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 9.25closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 9.25closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.143 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 9.25 Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 9.25 Linux desktopcloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 9.25closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 9.26closeIntel Mac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:38 | by ThaDafinser