User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (Vodafone/1.0/LG-KC910/V08e Browser/Obigo-Q7.1 MMS/LG-MMS-V1.0/1.2 Java/ASVM/1.1 Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-obigo.yaml
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKC910mobile:featureyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.043 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Obigo closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LGKC910smartphoneyes0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Obigo 7.1close LGKC910closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Obigo Browser LGLGKC910closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.433 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.1 LGKC910mobile:featureyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
SoftBank Mobile LG-KC910closeclosecloseclosemobilephoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Teleca Obigo Q05Aclose Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:38 | by ThaDafinser