User agent detail

J2ME/UCWEB7.0.3.45/139/7682
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
J2ME UCWEB7.0.3.45closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeJVM mobile-browseryescloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.0 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.0.3close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.0.3.45close closecloseclosecloseclose0.101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.0.3.45 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.452 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.0Gecko mobile:featureyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:38 | by ThaDafinser