User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/6.0; .NET4.0E; .NET4.0C; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Maxthon/3.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon 3Windows 8Trident 6.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.19302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 3.0WebKit Windows 8desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05001 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 3.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 3Trident 6.0Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:36 | by ThaDafinser