User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 5.1.1; SM-T817T Build/LMY47X) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.94 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-chrome.yaml
Chrome 45Android 5.1.1Blink 537.36SamsungGalaxy Tab S2 9.7tabletyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 5.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.13701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 5.1.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.26803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 45.0Blink Android 5.1SamsungSM-T817Ttabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeAndroid 5.1.1SamsungSM-T817Tcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 5.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.94WebKit 537.36Android 5.1.1Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 45Blink Android 5.1.1SamsungGalaxy Tab S2 9.7tabletyescloseclose0.043 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.94closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 45closeAndroid 5.1SamsungSM-T817TTabletyesyescloseclose0.04201 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:36 | by ThaDafinser