User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; Trident/6.0; ARM; Touch; WPDesktop; Lumia 1530)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/manufacturer-microsoft.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 11Windows Phone 8.1Trident 6.0MicrosoftLumia 1530mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 10.0Trident 6.0Win8 6.2Tabletyesyes0.06701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 10.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 10.0closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident Windows 8NokiaLumia 1530smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 10.0closeWindows 8 NokiaLumia 1530closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 10.0closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 10.0Trident 6.0Windows Phone 8.0MicrosoftLumia 1530mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 10.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 8Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:36 | by ThaDafinser