User agent detail

FlixsteriOS/6.18.4 (iPad; CPU OS 7_0_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/11B554a
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
Flixster App 6.18iOS 7.0unknown AppleiPadTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Flixster App 6.18WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadTabletyesyes0.008 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 537.51.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPadmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari WebKit iOS 7.0AppleiPadtabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeiOS 7.0.4closeiPadcloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari UIWebView 7.0.4closeiOS 7.0.4AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari closeiPhone OS 7.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
WebKit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPadcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.39904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 537.51.1iOS 7.0.4AppleiPadtabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Webview closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:35 | by ThaDafinser