User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/25.0 Iceweasel/25.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-279.php
Iceweasel 25.0Linux unknown25.0 unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 25.0Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.052 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IceWeasel 25.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 25.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Iceweasel 25.0closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Iceweasel 25.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.16002 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 20100101Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Iceweasel 25.0Gecko 25.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 25.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 25.0closeWindows 8Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:35 | by ThaDafinser