User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.3; ru-ru; D10A_FGN Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Android 4.0Android 4.3unknown unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.3GenericAndroid 4.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.31003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.3yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.3closeAndroid 4.3D10A_FGNcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.30Android 4.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.3D10A_FGNmobile:smartyescloseclose0.10201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.3closeAndroid 4.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:35 | by ThaDafinser