User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.3; GT-I9300I Build/JLS36C) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.141 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9300I Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.3SamsungGT-I9300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.26103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 35.0Blink Android 4.3SamsungGALAXY S IIIsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeAndroid 4.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.3SamsungGT-I9300Icloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.12801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.141WebKit 537.36Android 4.3Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.3SamsungGalaxy S IIImobile:smartyescloseclose0.037 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.141closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 35closeAndroid 4.3SamsungGT-I9300ISmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05401 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:35 | by ThaDafinser