User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; en_us) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0 Ninesky-android-mobile/2.0.2 Safari/535.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/browser-ninesky.yaml
NineSky 2.0.2Android Webkit mobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 6.0Gecko 6.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 6.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 6.0closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.05801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 6.0Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NineSky 2.0.2Webkit Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:35 | by ThaDafinser