User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; acedo crawler extension)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
acedo crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 7.0Trident Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 7.0close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesacedo crawlerclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 7.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.06101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 7.0Trident closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 7.0 closeclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close yescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:34 | by ThaDafinser