User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 2.3.6 en-us; SCH-R820 Build/GINGERBREAD) AppleWebKit/533,1 (KHTML, like Gecko vERSION/4.0) Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCH-R820 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid SamsungSCH-R820mobile-browseryescloseclose0.29303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3SamsungSCH-R820smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.6closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.6closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungSCH-R820closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.3.6 en-usclosecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Admire 4Gcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533Android 2.3.6SamsungAdmiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.05301 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 2.3closeAndroid 2.3SamsungSCH-R820Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.05501 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:33 | by ThaDafinser