User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android; Opera Mini/20.0.1396/35.6497; U; de) Presto/2.8.119 Version/11.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
Opera Mini 20.0Android unknown2.8 unknowngeneral Mobile PhoneMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini 20.0Presto 2.8Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 20.0.1396closeAndroid OperaMini 5mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mini 20.0Presto Android yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 20.0.1396closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 20.0.1396closeAndroid closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 20.0.1396closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.10901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 20.0.1396Presto 2.8.119Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 20.0Presto 2.8.119Android mobile:smartyescloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 11.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mini 6close OperaMini 5Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:33 | by ThaDafinser