User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.153 UBrowser/2.0.1144.0 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-uc.yaml
UC Browser 2.0Windows VistaBlink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.04 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.21702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Windows Vistadesktop0.011 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.08201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.153WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.57006 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 2.0Blink Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.153closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 35.0.1849.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:33 | by ThaDafinser