User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-at) AppleWebKit/534.35 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.65 Safari/534.35 Puffin/2.10977AT
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-876.php
Puffin 2.0Android unknownunknown unknowngeneral TabletTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Puffin 2.0WebKit Android Tabletyesyes0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Puffin 2.10977closeAndroid mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Puffin 2.10977WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.022 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Puffin 2.10977closeLinux Tabletcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Puffin 2.10977WebKit 534.35 Android Tabletcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Puffin 2Webkit 534.35Android tabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 11.0.696.65closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:32 | by ThaDafinser