User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; Maxthon/3.0)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-maxthon.yaml
Maxthon 3Windows XPTrident 4.0desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Maxthon closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Maxthon 3.0WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Maxthon 3.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.046 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Maxthon 3.0Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Maxthon 3Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:32 | by ThaDafinser