User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (MobilePhone; NetFront/4.1; like Gecko) USCC-E4277 1.001UC
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
CellularE4277 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront 4.1NetFront Mobile Deviceyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
NetFront 4.1close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront 4.1NetFront SanyoFire HD 6feature phoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 4.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront 4.1close CellularE4277closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
NetFront Mobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront 4.1 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:32 | by ThaDafinser