User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (DTV) AppleWebKit/531.2+ (KHTML, like Gecko) Espial/6.0.4 AQUOSBrowser/1.0 (US00DTV;V;0001;0001)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sharp.yaml
Espial 6.0.4 Webkit 531.2SharpAquos TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 531.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Espial 6.0.4close media-playercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Espial TV Browser 6.0WebKit SharpAquos Net Plustv0.018 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Espial 6.0.4close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 5.0WebKit 531.2 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Espial 6.0.4Webkit 531.2 SharpAquos TVtelevisioncloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SharpAQUOS TV BrowserSmart-TVcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:31 | by ThaDafinser