User agent detail

UCWEB/2.0 (Linux; U; Adr 2.3.6; en-US; GT-I8150) U2/1.0.0 UCBrowser/8.2.0.242 U2/1.0.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
UC Browser 8.2.0.242Android 2.3.6 SamsungGALAXY Wsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 8.2U2 Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
UCWEB 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser closeLinux SamsungGT-I8150mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25603 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 8.2 Android 2.3SamsungGALAXY Wsmartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.2.0closeAndroid 2.3.6SamsungGT-I8150closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 2.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.2.0.242 Linux Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.2Gecko Android 2.3.6SamsungGalaxy Wmobile:smartyescloseclose0.05401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 8closeAndroid 2.3SamsungGT-I8150Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:31 | by ThaDafinser