User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010091808 ThumbShotsBot (KFSW 3.0.6-3)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
ThumbShotsBot Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesThumbShotsBotBot/Crawler0.06201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:1.9.0.19closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.19202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
close closeclosecloseyescloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close closeclosecloseyesThumbShotsBotclose0.005 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.9.0.19Gecko 2010091808Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Gecko 1.9.0Linux desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.0.19closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:30 | by ThaDafinser