User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; U30GT 2H Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/35.0.1916.69 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tablet.yml
Chrome 35.0.1916.69Android 4.2.2Blink CubeU30GT 2Htablet Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08701 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.69closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.69closeAndroid 4.2.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.28203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 35.0Blink Android 4.2CubeU30GT 2Htabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.69closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 35.0.1916closeAndroid 4.2.2CubeU30GT 2Hcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.06301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 35.0.1916.69WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 35Blink Android 4.2.2U30GT 2Htabletyescloseclose0.12701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 35.0.1916.69closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome Mobile 42closeAndroid 4.2Tabletyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:30 | by ThaDafinser