User agent detail

MOT-C698p/0B.93.0CR MIB/2.2 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
MotorolaC698p Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MOT-C698p 0B.93.0CRcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2close MotorolaC698pmobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
MotorolaC698psmartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close MotorolaC698pcloseclosecloseclose0.015 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
MIB 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05701 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Motorola Internet Browser 2.2 MotorolaC698pmobile:featureyescloseclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close MotorolaC698pFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:30 | by ThaDafinser