User agent detail

Spillo/70 CFNetwork/720.0.9 Darwin/14.0.0 (x86_64)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-651.php
CFNetwork 0.0MacOSX 10.10unknown AppleMacintoshDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
CFNetwork WebKit MacOSX 10.10AppleMacintoshDesktop0.027 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Spillo 70closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
closeOS X 10.10desktop-browsercloseclose0.20002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mac 10.10desktop0.017 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
CFNetwork 720.0.9closeMac OS X 10.10.0Applecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Darwin closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.45305 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
OS X Yosemite 10.10desktopcloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0.3closeIntel Mac OS X 10_10 Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:29 | by ThaDafinser