User agent detail

LG-C1300i UP.Browser/6.2.3 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LGC1300i Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA LGC1300iMobile Phoneyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-C1300i closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3close LGC1300imobile-browseryescloseclose1.21912 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LGC1300ismartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LGC1300icloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3 LGLGC1300icloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.61606 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGC1300imobile:featureyescloseclose0.021 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGC1300iFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.034 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:29 | by ThaDafinser