User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux mips) Presto/2.12.407 Version/12.50 , KreaTV/12.36.2.2 (ARRIS, VMS1100, wired)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/tv.yml
Opera 12.50GNU/Linux Presto 2.12.407ARRISVMS1100tv Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.005 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.17702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.50Presto GNU/Linux ARRISVMS1100tv0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.50 , KreaTV/12.36.2.2 (ARRIS, VMS1100, wired)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.50closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.50closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.07101 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.50Presto 2.12.407Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.4Presto 2.12.407 ArrisVMS1100 KreaTVtelevisioncloseclose0.007 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.50closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:29 | by ThaDafinser