User agent detail

ERO247 Android Application (16, ero247 v2.2.2) - ZTE BASE Lutea 2 ZTE - FFFFFFFF-A525-1B67-FFFF-FFFFE739CFF0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
ZTEBASE Lutea 2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
ERO247 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid ZTEBASEmobile-browseryescloseclose0.30103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android ZTEBASEsmartphoneyes0.013 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid ZTEBASE Lutea 2closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.49405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android ZTEBASEmobile:smartyescloseclose0.14101 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.049 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:28 | by ThaDafinser