User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Android 4.0.3; Linux; Opera Tablet/ADR-1301080958) Presto/2.11.355 Version/12.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-492.php
Opera Mobile 12.10Android 4.02.10 unknowngeneral TabletTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.10Android 4.0Tabletyesyes0.006 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 12.10closeAndroid 4.0.3OperaTablet on Androidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto Android 4.0tabletyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.10closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Tablet 12.10closeAndroid 4.0.3Tabletcloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.10closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.06501 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.10Presto 2.11.355Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 12.10Presto 2.11.355Android 4.0.3tabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.10closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Tablet 12closeAndroid 4.0OperaTablet on AndroidTabletyesyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:28 | by ThaDafinser