User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (J2ME/MIDP; Opera Mini/9.80 (S60; SymbOS; Opera Mobi/23.348; U; en) Presto/2.5.25 Version/10.54
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mini 9.80 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mini Presto 2.2JAVA Mobile Deviceyes0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.54closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mini 9.80closeJVM OperaMini 1mobile-browseryescloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.54Presto Symbian OS Series 60 yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera Mini 9.80closeSymbOS closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mini 9.80closeSymbian OS closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mini 9.80closeSymbOS closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera Mini 9.80Presto 2.5.25Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mini 9.80Presto 2.5.25Series60 mobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.54closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
MAUI Browser close OperaMini 4Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:27 | by ThaDafinser