User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; chromeframe; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; Sleipnir 2.8.5)3.0.30729)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 8.0Trident 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 8.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 8.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Frame WebKit Windows XPdesktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Sleipnir 2.8.5closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Sleipnir 2.8.5closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.07201 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Sleipnir Trident 4.0Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.46605 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 8.0Trident 4.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 8.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 8(Compatibility View)closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:27 | by ThaDafinser