User agent detail

HUAWEI-G7300/HUAWEI_G7300_S_WIFI_V100R001B201C200SP04 Browser/Opera MMS/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 Opera/9.80 (MTK; U; en-GB) Presto/2.5.28 Version/10.10
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HuaweiG7300 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.2Android Mobile Phoneyesyes0.05201 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.10closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.10closeMRE HuaweiG7300mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 10.10Presto MTK / Nucleus HuaweiG7300smartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 10.10close HuaweiG7300closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 10.10close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.10Presto 2.5.28 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.10Presto 2.5.28MRE HuaweiG7300mobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.10closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close HuaweiG7300Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:26 | by ThaDafinser