User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.2; Avant Browser; Avant Browser; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; InfoPath.2)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-184.php
Avant 0.0WinXP 5.2unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Avant Trident WinXP 5.2Windows DesktopDesktop0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Avant Browser closeWindows 5.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.18902 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Avant Browser Windows Server 2003desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Avant 1closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Avant Browser closeWindows Server 2003 closecloseclosecloseclose0.17702 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Avant Browser Windows Windows NT 5.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.56506 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Avant Browser Windows Server 2003desktopcloseclose0.022 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 7.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 7.0closeWindows XPDesktopcloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:26 | by ThaDafinser