User agent detail

LG-LG221C/1.0[TF268435460913082532385850013082189256] Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.8 (GUI) MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG221C Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG-LG221C 1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8close LGLG221Cmobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 LG221Csmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close LG221Ccloseclosecloseclose0.012 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.8 LGLGLG221Ccloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 LGLG221Cmobile:featureyescloseclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close LGLG221CFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:25 | by ThaDafinser