User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows Phone 8.1; ARM; Trident/7.0; Touch; rv:11.0; IEMobile/11.0; HTC; C620d; ChinaTelecom) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/mobile/os-windowsphone.yaml
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Windows Phone 8.1Trident 7.0HTC8Xmobile:smartyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 11.0Trident 7.0WinPhone8.1 8.1Mobile Phoneyesyes0.12801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mozilla rv:11.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.19602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 11.0Trident Windows Phone 8.1HTCC620dsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1closeWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone 8.1HTCC620dcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 11.0closeWindows Phone OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows Phone 8.1HTC8Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile 9.0closeWindows Phone 8.1Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:25 | by ThaDafinser