User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S7230-VODAFONE/1.0; U; Bada/1.0; en-us) OperaMini/5.0.21073 Mobile WVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 NexPla
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S7230-VODAFONE Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
closeBada 1.0SamsungWave 723mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Bada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 5.0.21073close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeBada 1.0SamsungGT-S7230-VODAFONEcloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera SamsungMobilecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Bada 1.0SamsungWave 723mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungGT-S7230Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.037 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser