User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Series40/3.0FP1; Alcatel-OT-802A/1.0; Profile/MIDP-2.1 Configuration/CLDC-1.1) Gecko/20100401 S40OviBrowser/null
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AlcatelOT-802A Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
IBrowse close desktop-browsercloseclose0.19802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Symbian OS Series 40 AlcatelOT-802Asmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
close AlcatelOT-802Acloseclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Mozilla close closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Ovi Browser Gecko 20100401Symbian closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Nokia Xpress Gecko Series40 AlcatelOne Touch 802Amobile:featureyescloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
S40 Ovi Browser 1.8closeNokia Series 40 NokiaFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:30:24 | by ThaDafinser